Post-Processing — Inspection

Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Providers

Non-Destructive Testing inspects AM parts for internal defects — porosity, lack of fusion, cracking — without damaging the component. CT scanning, ultrasonic testing, dye penetrant inspection, and X-ray radiography are commonly applied to metal AM parts in regulated industries. Find NDT providers on ForgedLink verified for NADCAP accreditation, equipment calibration, and inspector certification.

Industrial CT scanning NADCAP accreditation ASNT Level II / III Internal defect detection Aerospace + medical critical
Not sure which provider fits your brief? Answer 5 quick questions and we'll surface the best-matched provider for your application.
Match me to a provider →

No providers found

Try broadening your brief — remove a certification filter, widen the material selection, or show all manufacturing types.

Reset filters →
Are you a verified AM service provider?

Join the network and receive matched briefs directly — before they open to the wider market. Founding providers pay 0% commission.

Apply as a Provider →

How NDT methods qualify AM parts

AM parts can hide defects no surface inspection will catch — sub-surface gas porosity, lack-of-fusion stripes between melt tracks, internal cracks from residual stress, and trapped powder in unvented cavities. Traditional cast and forged parts share many of these failure modes, so the NDT toolkit (CT, ultrasonic, dye penetrant, X-ray, eddy current) was already mature when AM industrialised. What's new is the volume of internal geometry AM parts contain: lattice structures, conformal cooling channels, and topology-optimised webs all need inspection methods that can see inside the part — and that's where industrial CT has become the AM-defining inspection technology.

A typical regulated AM workflow runs three layers of inspection: visual + dimensional (CMM, structured-light scanning) for external geometry; surface NDT (dye penetrant for non-magnetic alloys, magnetic particle for ferrous) for surface-breaking defects; and volumetric NDT (industrial CT, ultrasonic, X-ray) for internal defects. For aerospace and medical first-article qualification, all three are typically performed on every part. For ongoing serial production, a sampling protocol is agreed with the customer — often 100% CT for safety-critical parts, statistical sampling for less-critical work.

NDT methods commonly applied to AM parts

Industrial CT scanning (volumetric)

The AM-defining inspection method. 225 kV systems handle small Ti and Al parts; 450 kV needed for steel parts up to ~150 mm; 600 kV+ "macro CT" for larger / denser geometries. Detects internal porosity down to ~50 µm, lack-of-fusion bands, and trapped powder in internal channels.

Ultrasonic testing (UT)

Phased-array UT for thick-section AM parts where CT cannot penetrate (large IN718, thick stainless). Used for in-service MRO inspection of repaired turbine blades and DED-built large structurals.

Dye penetrant inspection (PT)

Surface-breaking defects on non-magnetic alloys (Ti, Ni, Al, austenitic stainless). Cheap, fast, and required by ASTM E1417 for many aerospace flow-downs. Mostly performed after surface finishing to avoid false positives from as-built roughness.

Magnetic particle inspection (MPI)

Surface-breaking defects on ferrous alloys (17-4 PH, 15-5 PH, 4140, maraging). Required by ASTM E1444 for aerospace ferrous parts. Applied after surface finishing.

X-ray radiography (RT)

Faster than CT for 2D defect detection — used as a screening method on serial-production parts where CT scanning every part is uneconomic. Real-time digital radiography (DR) is now standard.

Coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and structured-light scanning

External dimensional verification — CMM for prismatic features, structured-light or laser scanning for organic AM geometries. Often combined with first-article CT in a single inspection workflow.

Eddy current testing (ECT)

Surface and near-surface defect detection on conductive alloys, including conductivity verification (a proxy for heat-treat condition on aluminium). Used selectively in aerospace and energy applications.

NDT method selection by AM alloy and part class

Ti-6Al-4V (LPBF / EBM, aerospace + medical)

Industrial CT (225–450 kV) is the gold standard for first-article qualification — ASTM E2962 governs CT inspection of metal AM. Surface PT per ASTM E1417 after finishing. Implant-grade work also gets dimensional CT for as-built geometry verification.

Inconel 718 / 625

CT at 450 kV+ for thinner sections; UT for thick rocket-engine and turbine components. Surface PT post-machining. Dimensional CMM for critical mating features.

Stainless 17-4 PH / 15-5 PH

CT or X-ray for internal defects, surface MPI per ASTM E1444 (ferrous), dimensional CMM. The MPI step is the main differentiator from austenitic stainless inspection.

Stainless 316L (austenitic)

CT or X-ray for internal defects, surface PT (PT not MPI — austenitic stainless is non-magnetic). For pressure-rated parts, hydrostatic burst testing in addition.

AlSi10Mg / Aluminium

CT at 225 kV (aluminium is X-ray-transparent — easier to scan than steel/Ti). Eddy current conductivity testing as a non-destructive proxy for T6 heat-treat verification. Surface PT for safety-critical features.

CoCrMo (medical implants)

CT for as-built porosity and dimensional verification; for porous lattice structures, CT is the only practical inspection method. PT for surface defects after polishing.

Polymer AM (SLS / MJF / SLA)

CT scanning for internal voids, trapped powder (SLS), and dimensional verification — especially for medical-device polymer parts. Optical 3D scanning for external dimensional QC. Density measurement for SLS / MJF process control.

How to specify NDT for AM parts

Reference the ASTM / ISO standard, not the technique. "Inspect per ASTM E2962 with acceptance criteria per customer drawing" gives the NDT provider an auditable framework to work from and ties the part to a published methodology that any NADCAP-accredited shop can execute.

Verify ASNT certification. NDT inspection results are only as good as the inspector. ASNT (American Society for Non-destructive Testing) certifies inspectors at Levels I, II, and III. For aerospace work, Level II is the minimum for routine inspection; Level III is required for technique development and signoff. Equivalent EN 4179 / NAS 410 certifications apply in European aerospace.

Specify NADCAP for aerospace. NADCAP (National Aerospace and Defence Contractors Accreditation Program) accredits the NDT provider's entire process system — equipment calibration, inspector certification, procedure documentation, customer audit trail. For any AS9100-flowed-down aerospace part, the NDT provider must be NADCAP NDT-accredited.

First-article CT, then sampling. Industrial CT is expensive (£200–£1,500 per part typical, higher for large-section steel and IN718). Standard practice is 100% CT for the first article and a sampling protocol thereafter — agreed in writing with the customer based on part criticality and process maturity.

Lead time and cost expectations for AM NDT

Standard NDT delivers in 3–10 working days from receipt of parts, depending on inspection method mix. Industrial CT scanning of a single small Ti aerospace bracket runs 1–4 hours of machine time; volumetric review and reporting adds another 1–3 days. Surface PT / MPI is faster — typically same-day to 2-day turnaround. Comprehensive first-article inspection packages (CT + PT + CMM + dimensional report) typically take 1–2 weeks.

Indicative pricing varies sharply by method: surface PT / MPI: £30–£90 / €35–€105 per part; X-ray / DR: £80–£200 / €95–€235 per part; industrial CT: £200–£1,500 / €240–€1,750 per part depending on alloy, size, voxel resolution, and reporting depth. CMM dimensional inspection is typically charged hourly (£70–£150 / €85–€175 per hour). Production sampling protocols dramatically reduce per-part cost compared with 100% inspection.

Related processes & materials

Frequently asked questions

Why is CT scanning so important for AM parts?

Because most AM defects are internal. Lack-of-fusion porosity, gas porosity, internal cracks, and trapped powder in unvented cavities are all invisible from the outside but can fail a fatigue-loaded part. Industrial CT is the only practical NDT method that can detect these defects in complex AM geometry, lattice structures, and conformal-cooled parts. ASTM E2962 specifically governs CT inspection of metal AM components.

What is NADCAP and why does it matter for NDT?

NADCAP (National Aerospace and Defence Contractors Accreditation Program) is the aerospace industry's shared accreditation programme — when a customer like Boeing, Airbus, or GE requires NADCAP NDT accreditation, they're saying the supplier's NDT processes have been audited against AC7114 standards by the SAE Performance Review Institute. For any aerospace AM part flowed down from AS9100D, NADCAP NDT-accredited inspection is typically mandatory.

Do I need 100% inspection or can I sample?

Depends on part criticality. Aerospace flight-safety parts and Class III medical implants typically require 100% inspection of every part. Lower-criticality aerospace parts (cabin, non-structural), non-implantable medical devices, and industrial parts often run on a sampling protocol — agreed in writing between customer and supplier based on process maturity, part criticality, and risk-assessment results. Always document the inspection sampling rate as part of the part PO.

Can NDT detect every defect in an AM part?

No — every NDT method has detection limits. Industrial CT typically detects voids down to ~50 µm in ideal conditions, but very thin features can mask defects, and very dense alloys (IN718, CoCrMo) limit penetration. Surface PT detects only surface-breaking defects. UT can miss defects oriented parallel to the beam. Robust qualification programmes use multiple complementary methods and known reference standards to verify the inspection technique's defect-detection capability for each part class.

When should NDT happen in the production chain?

Standard sequence: print → stress relief → wire-EDM separate → HIP → solution + age → rough machine → first dimensional / CT inspection → finish machine → final surface NDT (PT / MPI) → final dimensional / CMM inspection → release. Surface NDT must happen after surface finishing (as-built roughness produces too many false positives). CT can happen at multiple stages — first-article post-HIP to verify densification, and final post-machining to verify no defects were exposed.

Is in-process monitoring a substitute for NDT?

Not yet — but it's heading that way. Modern LPBF machines (EOS M300-4, SLM NXG, Nikon SLM, Aconity) ship with melt-pool monitoring, layer-image-based defect detection, and in-process thermal imaging. These technologies are improving fast and are increasingly used to flag suspect builds for additional NDT. They are not yet a regulatory substitute for post-build NDT in aerospace or medical applications, but the gap is closing — first-article qualification programmes increasingly use in-process data as supporting evidence alongside CT scanning.